We're all pilgrims on the same journey - but some pilgrims have better road maps. Nelson DeMille
I need a better map. Marianne Wallace

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Creating an e-book

          Creating an e-book was quite an adventure.  I tried to find a book that I could adapt for my purposes, providing background knowledge about World War II and what life was like for different cultures during that time, but I could not find anything short enough or on an upper elementary level.  There may be some books out there that would have worked, but I could not find them.  So, I made up my own book.  Interestingly, writing the book itself was not the difficult part.  Keeping it short enough to be an effective teaching tool was a challenge for me.  I also spent a lot of time trying to find good pictures that could be used with permission.  The resources on the book builder suite were very helpful in that regard, especially the Creative Commons site.  The Flickr site was not particularly good for this project for me, as the pictures I wanted were really too old to be found there.  Using the book builder site itself was very easy.  The instructions were clear, and the help site was very valuable.  It actually took longer to find the pictures and to edit myself than anything else.  The only problem I had with the website itself was with the Table of Contents.  Since my e-book was nonfiction, I wanted to use a Table of Contents.  The tool itself was not difficult at all: all you had to was click a box at the top of each page with the title, & the Table of Contents was created for you, with the names of each section, as well as a hot link on the page number to take you to the page.  The problem I ran into was that for some reason the spacing on my Table of Contents page was off, so the titles of the pages were not lined up at all.  I tried for quite a while to correct it, but I finally just deleted the page.  If I had chosen to make my book longer, I think a Table of Contents would have been a more necessary component. 
          The purpose for my e-book was to use it as a teaching tool to support background knowledge.  This teaching method is part of instruction designed to support the recognition learning network. (Rose & Meyer, 2002)  The lesson I will be teaching is about point of view; this story is also designed to introduce to the students the fact that different cultures had different experiences during World War II, even though everyone in the world was affected by the war.  I used a glossary, so that students would begin to become familiar with terms they might read in their chosen books.  I really like the glossary feature, even for gifted and talented students.  Many times students become discouraged when reading a story that may have words above their grade level.  Instead of looking the word up in a dictionary or using context clues, many of them just put the book down.  The interactive glossary feature on an e-book can inspire them to keep reading.  I also used the picture feature on the glossary units I created, to ensure understanding and to make the glossary visually interesting. The coach feature was fun; I used mine to tell more about the pictures I used in the story.  This particular feature could have a myriad of applications.  I did not take time to record my voice reading the story, but I like the fact that I can if I wish, or students can listen to the computer read it if necessary.  This would certainly overcome a curriculum barrier for students that are visually impaired or with a limited vocabulary or reading ability.  (Rose & Meyer, 2002)  I think the use of e-books in a classroom is an answer to many of the curriculum barriers our students face.

References: 
Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved on March 16, 2012, from http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Web Conference March 11, 2012

     Wow, our web conference tonight had a LOT of information. We basically covered two weeks tonight, since our next one will not be until after the Week 3 assignment has been turned in. I feel like we have a pretty good handle on what is expected from our group assignment, although I was kind of concerned when one group said their collaboration document ran over 40 pages! (How many people are in their group?) One thing that is kind of annoying is when people come late to the web conference and ask the same questions over and over again. Can't they scroll back and read what has already been asked? It wastes a lot of time. Tonight we were having some pretty bad weather, so maybe they had trouble getting into the conference. This week there was a discrepancy over the assignment. Although we had gotten a heads up over the issue and a clarification from Dawn, once again, we submitted our assignment after the web conference. Anyway, we received a lot of critical information tonight concerning our UDL, so once again, I am grateful for the opportunity to connect with my teachers and IA's in this manner.

Marianne Wallace EDLD5364/ET8038

Week 2 Reflection

     This week was a very busy one.  Of the four readings, my favorite was from our textbook, Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007).  I enjoyed reading about the different tools, some of which I have used in the past and some that were new to me.  I like having a book with hands on references that I can use in my assignments and in my work.  It is interesting to me that the two readings that discussed the effects of technology in the classroom, Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socioeconomic status (Page, 2002) and The impact of education technology on student achievements (Schacter, 1999), although only about ten years old, were really out of date when you consider how far technology has progressed in the last five years.  While both articles had valid information, these articles cited studies from the 1980’s and early 1990’s, and even some studies conducted in the 1970’s.  Cell phones were considered science fiction in the 1970’s, and tools such as interactive whiteboards were not even dreamed of yet.  I always enjoy reading the discussion boards and seeing the different opinions people have.  Sometimes my classmates highlight items in an article that I completely missed, or they present an entirely different perspective about an issue that never even occurred to me.

      My favorite part of this week’s work was collaborating with my group.  Both of my partners have lots of creative ideas about how to approach our assignment, and with their input, we are going to have a far superior product than I could ever have created alone.  I really like working on a Google document, especially when someone else starts working on it at the same time as you are.  It’s very funny to see my computer just start typing away when my hands aren’t even on the keyboard!  I feel very satisfied with our work this week, and think we have a good plan for our unit we will complete this coming week.


References:
Page, M. (2002). Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socioeconomic status. Journal of research on technology in education, 34 (4). Retrieved October 5, 2009 from http://www.iste.org
 Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA:  Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA; Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Retrieved on March 11, 2012, from http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME161.pdf


Marianne Wallace  EDLD5364/ET8038

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Web Conference March 4, 2012

Our web conference got off to kind of a rocky start this evening, what with the audio continuing to be problematic, and then Dr. Cummings being kicked off in the middle of the conference. However, when she returned things ran smoother, and although we are still resorting to chat only, lots of important information was once again gleaned from the conference. While I was still needing information concerning Week 1’s assignment (I do wish we could have had a conference earlier in the week), most of the questions were concerning Week 2 and Week 3 assignments. These conferences are really vital for me, as I sometimes misunderstand the week’s assignments, and the conferences often save me from grave mistakes! Tonight is a perfect example. All three of our group members thought that for this group project we could just add pages to the existing website we had created in the last class, not realizing we had to create an entire new one. So, after the conference, I simply created a new one, and we all adjusted our assignments accordingly. We have gotten into the habit of not submitting our assignments until after the web conference; I believe it is a trend we will continue. The web conferences continue to be a very important clarification process for me. I feel lucky we have them, in spite of technical difficulties!
Marianne Wallace
EDLD5364/ET8038

EDLD5364: Weekly Reflection


Weekly Reflection, March 4, 2012
     This week had a new term for an education method that I was taught as a student teacher fifteen years ago: constructivism. Discussing background knowledge, asking probing questions, and good old K-W-L charts are all examples of constructivism I have been using in my classroom for years, only without the help of technology. I am also familiar with the theory of connectivism, but we referred to it as teaching across the curriculum. This is what I do every day in my Social Living class: when I teach a lesson, I am not just teaching Science or Social Studies to first graders, I am also teaching Reading, Language, Spelling, Handwriting, and sometimes Math as well. The Cyborg theory was a little out in left field for me. I know that this type of surgery (computer chips implanted in the nerves) is used in the medical field, especially with people who have suffered nerve injuries, but implanting chips with knowledge is a new one to me. It’s a little like Star Trek, and I’m afraid I can’t really get into human beings becoming a sub-species. I found the readings very interesting when they discussed that using technology as part of the learning process actually stimulates the students to further their own learning (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000, p. 208).  I have seen this in action when we began using interactive whiteboards in our classrooms. I am looking forward to using more technology to apply these theories with my first grade students.   
      Another interesting thing that drew my attention was the discussion concerning the prevalence of the use of MySpace (Solomon & Schrum, 2007, p.21).  This is another example of how much the Internet has changed in a very short period of time; in the five years since this book was written, MySpace has been so eclipsed by Facebook as to become almost obsolete. 
      Our team got together again, although one of our members, Casey, is not in our class this time. We will miss her input and working with her. I am team leader, and I hope I do well by my team. We are to choose our subject and target audience this week for our lesson, so it looks like a busy week ahead.
      All in all, I feel as though this is going to be a labor intensive course, really utilizing all of our knowledge we have gained in our courses so far and connecting them with future learning, as well as a tremendous amount of collaboration with other members. Hey, that sounds like constructivism and connectivism to me! However, no chip implants for me, please.

Bransford, J.D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000).  How people learn; Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded edition). Ch. 9, pp. 194-218. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.  Retrieved on March 1, 2012 from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9853&page=208

Solomon G., and Schrum, L., (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools.  Eugene, OR:  International Society for Technology in Education, pp. 7-44.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Week 5: Course Reflection

The group website project taught me about a couple of technical items which I had not encountered with previous website creations:  you cannot put animations in the website, because Google does not support them, and in order for someone to see and participate in a comment section, the person must be an owner or an editor.   As important as this knowledge is, I learned some things that are even more significant, especially pertaining to myself and how I learn.  Collaborating on a group website was a very different experience than creating a website alone.   In some ways it was very comforting to not be the only person making decisions; yet at times, it was hard to give up control.  I am a perfectionist and edit and re-edit endlessly; now I had to trust someone else.   Another member undertook the initial   website set-up, so I was able to concentrate on the content of the pages for which I was responsible and our group logo.   I focused on the logo first, envisioning a dynamic symbol for our site.  Futilely, I kept trying to insert an animated figure into my design; this will not work on Google websites. This is the lesson I hope I have learned from the experience:  instead of fruitlessly repeating the same action, stop and research why it does not work.  As a lifelong learner, I find that there is still so much I need to learn about technology so that I can adequately assimilate it into my classroom instruction.   Overall, I enjoyed the project immensely; I really like the members of my group, and they added things to the website that would never have occurred to me.   Logistically it was impossible for the other three members to attend the conferences, so I assumed the role of reporter.  The input from other classmates in the conferences was invaluable. I feel as though I have a whole support group at my fingertips!

A class website is a vital tool in the education workbox, no matter the grade level: it can save time by eliminating unnecessary phone calls and notes, reassure parents, and connect the classroom with the home, making parents a part of their students’ education (Moulton, 2008).  It is difficult to disseminate all of the information that parents and students need every day to help fulfill the students’ educational needs, so a parent page is an important resource.  Regular Ed and Special Ed pages with websites that have references and resources for student and parent use should be a component of a class website as well.  All Internet users need to be schooled in Digital Ethics; this information should have priority on any education-related website, no matter the age or the level of expertise of the intended audience (Kruger, 2003). Additional pages can be added to a website, such as class information, how-to pages, or fun pages like pictures of class activities (“Teaching With Technology,” n.d.).  The list is limited only by the imagination of the teacher!



Classroom Web Site. (n.d. ). Teaching With Technology. Retrieved

         February 21, 2012, from




Kruger, R. (2003, July-August). Discussing cyber ethics with students is crucial.  

        The Social Studies, 188-189.



Moulton, J. (2008, February 19). The classroom web page: A must have in 2008.

          Retrieved on February 20, 2012 from




Marianne Wallace

EDLD5366/ET8038

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Group Website

Here is the link to our group website: https://sites.google.com/site/ctoceducation/
It is called C to C Education: Fighting Ignorance Coast to Coast!  Check it out! (I made the logo!)